Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 5b205892 authored by Antti Hyttinen's avatar Antti Hyttinen
Browse files

...

parent 2500020a
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ Furthermore, since $\unobservable$ is unobserved we can assume its variance to b
% (Any deviation from this can be achieved by adjusting intercepts and coefficients in the following).
In the setting we consider (Section~\ref{sec:}), a negative decision $T=0$ leads to successful outcome $Y=1$.
In the setting we consider (Section~\ref{sec:setting}), a negative decision $T=0$ leads to successful outcome $Y=1$.
%
When $T=1$, the probability of success is given by a logistic regression model over the features $\obsFeatures$ and $\unobservable$:
\begin{eqnarray}
......@@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ We model the decisions in the data similarly according to a logistic regression
) \label{eq:judgemodel}
\end{equation}%
%
Note that we are making the simplifying assumption that coefficients $\gamma_\obsFeatures,\gamma_\unobservable$ are the same for all $\human_\judgeValue$, but decision makers are allowed to differ in intercept $\alpha_\judgeValue$.
Although we model the decision makers here probabilistically, we do not imply that their decision are necessarily probabilistic (or include a random component). The probabilistic model arises from the unknown specific details of reasoning employed by each decision maker $\human_\judgeValue$.
Note also that we are making the simplifying assumption that coefficients $\gamma_\obsFeatures,\gamma_\unobservable$ are the same for all $\human_\judgeValue$, but decision makers are allowed to differ in intercept $\alpha_\judgeValue$.
%
Parameter $\alpha_{\judgeValue}$ controls the leniency of a decision maker $\human_\judgeValue \in \humanset$.
......
......@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Mc-Candless et al. perform Bayesian sensitivity analysis while taking into accou
The importance in-detail causal modeling and evaluating counterfactual outcomes, as observed also here, is particularly prominent in recent work on fairness of automatic decision making~\cite{DBLP:conf/icml/NabiMS19,DBLP:conf/icml/Kusner0LS19,coston2020counterfactual,madras2019fairness,corbett2017algorithmic,DBLP:journals/jmlr/BottouPCCCPRSS13,DBLP:conf/icml/NabiMS19,DBLP:conf/icml/JohanssonSS16}.
%To properly assess decision procedures for their performance and fairness we need to understand the causal relations
Finally, more applied work can be found for example in~\cite{murder,tolan2019why,kleinberg2018human,chouldechova2017fair,rennan2009evaluating}.
Finally, more applied work can be found for example in~\cite{murder,tolan2019why,kleinberg2018human,chouldechova2017fair,brennan2009evaluating}.
%\citet{} do what?
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment