Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 5ada5dee authored by Michael Mathioudakis's avatar Michael Mathioudakis
Browse files

Add a figure that explains the setting

The figure should explain in an intuitive manner what we do in the paper
parent 449e0416
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
File added
paper/img/setting.png

65 KiB

\section{Setting and problem statement} \section{Setting and problem statement}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{img/setting}
\end{center}
\caption{Setting}
\end{figure}
The setting we consider is described in terms of two decision processes. The setting we consider is described in terms of two decision processes.
% %
...@@ -81,7 +86,9 @@ Given a dataset $\{(H, X, T, Y)\}$, and a decision maker $M$, provide an estimat ...@@ -81,7 +86,9 @@ Given a dataset $\{(H, X, T, Y)\}$, and a decision maker $M$, provide an estimat
\end{problem} \end{problem}
\noindent \noindent
\mcomment{I think that leniency does not need to be part of the problem formulation, since imputation allows us to evaluate a decision maker even if we do not know its leniency level.} \mcomment{I think that leniency does not need to be part of the problem formulation, since imputation allows us to evaluate a decision maker even if we do not know its leniency level.}
Typically, we would like to evaluate decision maker $M$ at various leniency levels. Sometimes, we may have control over the leniency level of the decision maker we evaluate.
%
In such cases, we would like to evaluate decision maker $M$ at various leniency levels.
% %
Ideally, the estimate returned by the evaluation should also be accurate for all levels of leniency. Ideally, the estimate returned by the evaluation should also be accurate for all levels of leniency.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment