Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 15911bf7 authored by Antti Hyttinen's avatar Antti Hyttinen
Browse files

Contraction explained.

parent a74649a2
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -163,17 +163,18 @@ It is designed specifically to estimate the true failure rate of a machine decis
Contraction bases its evaluation only on the cases assigned to the most lenient decision maker $\human_l$ in the data.
%
%The algorithm removes cases with negative decision from that decision maker. % R_q
The approach assumes $\machine$ makes a negative decision for all cases for which the most lenient decision maker $\human_l$ makes a negative decision.
Because of the lower leniency of the evaluated decision maker $\machine$, the approach assumes $\machine$ makes a negative decision for all cases for which $\human_l$ makes a negative decision.
%
The cases with a positive decision by $\human_l$ are sorted according to the lowest leniency level at which they receive a positive decisions by the evaluated decision maker $\machine$. % R sort q
%
The sorted list is then {\it contracted} so that only cases in the \leniencyValue fraction
The cases with a positive decision by $\human_l$ are sorted according to the lowest leniency level at which they receive positive decisions by $\machine$. % R sort q
% I PUT HERE MATCH BECAUSE THE FRACTION NEEDS CONSIDER
The sorted list is then {\it contracted} to match the leniency level $\leniencyValue$ at which \machine is evaluated. Because all outcomes for subjects in this list are available in the data,
%so that only cases in the \leniencyValue fraction
%of the least dangerous
of cases are considered in the computation of the failure rate estimate: % R_b
The estimate is the number of negative outcomes in that contracted list (for which outcomes are observed) divided by the number of cases assigned $\human_l$. Because the cases are assigned randomly to all decision makers, this estimate gives an estimate of the failure rate on the whole dataset.
%of cases are considered in the computation of the failure rate estimate: % R_b
we can estimate the failure rate by the number of negative outcomes for cases in the contracted list divided by the number of cases assigned to $\human_l$. Because the cases are assigned randomly to all decision makers, this estimates the failure rate on the whole dataset.
%
\rcomment{Rewrote it to the best of my abilities. Ok now?}
\todo{MM}{Re-write the last two sentences.}
%\rcomment{Rewrote it to the best of my abilities. Ok now?}
%\todo{MM}{Re-write the last two sentences.}
In addition, we consider two baselines.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment