Update vastuu
Compare changes
+ 3
− 0
@@ -223,5 +223,8 @@ In a bit more detail, the idea is pretty much the following:
10) maybe there is someone who is responsible for creating such a situation in which the “gap” occurs, should we use machines that are out of our control and unpredictable? Maybe the manufacturer, designer or operator is not responsible for the accident but they are responsible for using a machine with possibly risky future behaviour. (If one is bad at throwing rock, one should not throw rocks in the presence of many windows.) Maybe the designers, users, etc. have a moral duty to be sufficiently risk aversive.
Obviously this is not a full analysis of responsibility gaps but maybe there are some elements that are useful when we analyze cases called responsibility gap situations. We are not sure how much help there is in the solution in which we broaden the scope of moral agency and get the moral responsibility allocated. At least the justification for this cannot be the moral solace or comfort it provides us with. In the next section we will discuss the possible views concerning the possibility of attributing responsibility to robots and other technological artifacts. We end up with a view according to which such attribution requires that the robots have capacities that they do not have or even can have. After that we will continue with the option that even if robots could not be moral agents, they could still somehow be partially responsible as being important causal actors in the network of events that lead to the accident. In the conclusion we will say something about the forward-looking collective responsibility to prevent such accidents from happening.
In the regulation of algorithms, particularly artificial intelligence and its subfield of machine learning, a right to explanation (or right to an explanation) is a right to be given an explanation for an output of the algorithm. Such rights primarily refer to individual rights to be given an explanation for decisions that significantly affect an individual, particularly legally or financially. For example, a person who applies for a loan and is denied may ask for an explanation, which could be "Credit bureau X reports that you declared bankruptcy last year; this is the main factor in considering you too likely to default, and thus we will not give you the loan you applied for."