diff --git a/paper/img/figures.pptx b/paper/img/figures.pptx
index 0e4e98c9ceacd308bc73f9273749c21d7a74c57f..f42b1f8a8a10b6a17aacebc52a2e43603cc216aa 100644
Binary files a/paper/img/figures.pptx and b/paper/img/figures.pptx differ
diff --git a/paper/img/setting.png b/paper/img/setting.png
index b9d5b3496eedf39cb1795efd653de68bd5ce1b7e..997bb104dc7f2f478ee42712260eaaaf1c208c72 100644
Binary files a/paper/img/setting.png and b/paper/img/setting.png differ
diff --git a/paper/setting.tex b/paper/setting.tex
index 4f9589f74df652463e6cda896c984a25cae2fdcc..f5c8fd1cb16cccfd81a8cbbbad2d519943ce56e4 100644
--- a/paper/setting.tex
+++ b/paper/setting.tex
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
 \section{Setting and problem statement}
 
-\begin{figure}
+\begin{figure*}
 \begin{center}
-\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{img/setting}
+\includegraphics[height=2in]{img/setting}
 \end{center}
-\caption{Setting}
-\end{figure}
+\caption{Setting. Negative decisions by decision maker $M$ ($T_{_M} = 0$) are evaluated as successful ($Y_{_M} = 1$) -- this is shown with the dashed arrows. For negative deisions by decision maker $H$ ($T_{_H} = 0$), we perform counterfactual imputation -- this is shown with the solid arrows.
+}
+\end{figure*}
 
 The setting we consider is described in terms of two decision processes.
 %