From 6bafde06cfa3ee3ad0c498bde63cc0aa936b331e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antti Hyttinen <ajhyttin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:59:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] minor fix.

---
 paper/sl.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/paper/sl.tex b/paper/sl.tex
index a5fb7df..70914a6 100755
--- a/paper/sl.tex
+++ b/paper/sl.tex
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
 Increasing number of important decision affecting people's lives are being made by machine learning and AI systems. 
 We study evaluating the quality of such decision makers.
 The major difficulty in such evaluation is that existing decision makers in use, whether AI or human, influence the data the evaluation is based on. For example, when
-deciding whether of defendant should be given bail or kept in jail, we are not able to directly observe the possible offences by defendants that the decision making system in use decides to keep in jail. To evaluate decision makers in these difficult settings, we derive a flexible Bayesian approach, that utilizes counterfactual-based imputation. Compared to previous state-of-the-art, the approach gives more accurate predictions on the decision quality with lower variance. The approach is also robust to different variations in the mechanisms producing the data.
+deciding whether of defendant should be given bail or kept in jail, we are not able to directly observe the possible offences by defendants that the decision making system in use decides to keep in jail. To evaluate decision makers in these difficult settings, we derive a flexible Bayesian approach, that utilizes counterfactual-based imputation. Compared to previous state-of-the-art, the approach gives more accurate predictions on the decision quality with lower variance. The approach is also shown to be robust to different variations in the mechanisms producing the data.
 \end{abstract}
 
 
-- 
GitLab